The Case Against The "Four" Crucified With Christ
This chapter discusses a theory brought about by E.W. Bullinger and promoted by Victor Paul Wierwille concerning four being crucified with Christ, and not just the two thieves. The two men attempt to harmonize the four gospel records using what only can be described as taking words out of context out of words already out of context to try to explain alleged contradictions. While agreeing to the contradictions as the records were interpreted by man, there were better historical and linguistic methods of finding out what happened to the biblical record of the crucifixion. Both men also attempt to use a photograph of a site in France that has five crosses as evidence their interpretation is correct. The history of that site and the crosses in the photograph are explained. The idea that the Aramaic is the original language of all the gospel records is disputed. The following is a breakdown of the chapter.
The Original Language of the Gospels
The Gospel Accounts of the Thieves/Robbers and Malefactors
"Cast the Same in His Teeth"
The Aramaic Record
Thieves (Robbers), or Malefactors?
Those Crucified on Either Side
The Order of Events
The "Midst" as an Expanded Middle in John 19:18
The Greek Word "Sun"
The Uses of Heteros and Allos in the Gospel Records of the Crucifixion
The Five Crosses at Ploubézéré
************
Order now by clicking on the image of the book or see more by clicking the home page hyperlink at the bottom of the page:
To see more of the book, click this hyperlink to the homepage below and then click on individual chapters for review of the chapters: